If a)I had a phone with a decent camera and b)it wasn't almost certainly illegal, I would be taking pictures of the small people (infants class - about 8-10, I'd guess) walking past my window dressed as Roman soldiers. They have cardboard swords and everything! So far I've seen 4 infantry, lots of togas, someone I think is meant to be a Briton, complete with tartan PJ trousers and someone in a silver cape.
Oh! And also, yesterday at the zoo we saw a tiny person (about 3) dressed in a wonderful matching hat and mac combo - it was purple with flowers on! WANT!
...I think it's official that the unseasonal weather* is going to my head...
*It's the British summer. Where's the hailstorm, cloud-cover and general misery?
Oh! And also, yesterday at the zoo we saw a tiny person (about 3) dressed in a wonderful matching hat and mac combo - it was purple with flowers on! WANT!
...I think it's official that the unseasonal weather* is going to my head...
*It's the British summer. Where's the hailstorm, cloud-cover and general misery?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-29 02:46 pm (UTC)I think the magic Wimbledon
roofsunshade is affecting the entire country...(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-29 04:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-29 05:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-29 08:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-29 05:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-29 04:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-29 05:40 pm (UTC)Of course, then they started hitting each other with the swords and it all got a bit ugly, but until then, very sweet ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-29 05:36 pm (UTC)It sounds adorable. Swords!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-29 05:46 pm (UTC)A mac is a raincoat, a properly waterproof one, not just a shower-proof one. Like 'hoover' for vacuum cleaner, it's a brand/person's name that's come to stand for a whole class of garments. Technically, only the branded (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mackintosh) ones are Macs, but they do do them in pretty colours. Sadly, you only get matching hats for the kiddie ones. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-29 08:07 pm (UTC)Interesting about "infant" - we only use the term for tiny humans (actually, could be other animals as well) who are too young to walk. I'd like to find out when and why the usages diverged. I have to teach the terminology we use in English for the stages of life, and I always like to give the students the regional variations if I can. That way they won't be gobsmacked if they travel and hear a different usage.
It sounds like you use the school terms (infant, junior, etc.) to refer to the ages of children - do you do that independent of a school context as well? Like, would you say, "I saw an infant playing with a ball in the street" if you saw some random six-year-old child?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-29 08:13 pm (UTC)If I was IN a school, I'd say "I saw the infants out playing at lunchtime" meaning "The lower half of the school" (most are mixed infants and juniors - we call them Primary Schools)
In other contexts, I'd probably qualify it a little: "I saw the infants classes playing at lunchtime."
Looking at that, it seems that when we make it plural, we make it very specifically describe children in the lower half of Primary school - "The Infants" effectively becomes a proper name.
But a random six year old child would be "a child". In that context, "an infant" would have the same meaning for me as for you, i.e. a child too young to walk.
Apparently, as ever, context is everything! (do keep asking if I'm not making sense - it's quite interesting!)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-06-29 09:27 pm (UTC)Oh, and don't jinx the weather! I bought a dress today and I intend to have the chance to wear it!