o.O

Sep. 23rd, 2009 05:36 pm
jadesfire: Bright yellow flower (Default)
[personal profile] jadesfire
Dear Estate Agent,

House hunting is hard. Being first time buyers is hard. Trawling through property websites and estate agents' lists for something suitable is boring and hard.

You are not helping.

No love,

Me

~~~~

The reason for this letter? I was doing one of my regular hunts for property websites that aren't Rightmove and stumbled across some interesting things. There were the usual houses in terrible areas, and terrible houses in good areas. All fine and dandy, you might think.

Under the cut is what one agent is selling for £120,000 as a bungalow.



Photobucket

I KID YOU NOT. Click the picture for the full details.

SRSLY. IDEK.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rivers-bend.livejournal.com
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *gasp*


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *wheeze*



WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT?????????????

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
BREATHE!!! Seriously! *g*

Oh, it gets better. Someone else lists it as a "detached" property.

Which...yes, okay, it's hard to argue with the literal accuracy, but still.

Just when you think estate agents have reached the limits of dodgy descriptions, they take it to a whole new level...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rivers-bend.livejournal.com
OMG "DETACHED" ALMOST KILLED ME.

*wipes tears*

gives new meaning to the word detached.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] entangled-now.livejournal.com
LMAO! Estate Agent Fail! That is a boat, it lives on the water.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
Yup. But you have to admit it's only one storey. So, you know... OBVIOUSLY IT IZ BUNGALOW.

TRUFAX.

*g*

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] entangled-now.livejournal.com
But what about all the storeys under the water D:

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
I think it's just got the one. Probably.

Or maybe it's taking the "sunken house" idea to a whole new level...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 08:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aeron-lanart.livejournal.com
A water-dwelling *detached* bungalow.

Do they mention it has an interesting water feature in the garden?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jpgr.livejournal.com
Do they say "waterfront property" or "view of the canal"? Seriously, the things they can get away with

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
*snort* They're not quite that cheeky, but I guess most websites don't have a 'canal boat' tag they can use...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:54 pm (UTC)
ext_25882: (Champlain)
From: [identity profile] nightdog-barks.livejournal.com
I WANT IT.

But no, not a bungalow. Hee.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
It's sweet, isn't it? I mean, I wouldn't want to live there, but it's very cute.

I like the agent who describes it as "detached" best. Because...well, it's only one storey and it's not actually attached to anything, so clearly it must be a detached bungalow.

...it's possible I'm spending too much time on this if I can figure out estate agent logic ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:10 pm (UTC)
ext_25882: (Looking West)
From: [identity profile] nightdog-barks.livejournal.com
It looks like something one might run across in The Wind In the Willows. And when you didn't want to live somewhere any more, you could just cast off and float away!

I suppose there are all kinds of jokes and pointed comments one could make about becoming unmoored ...

;-D

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
*smiles* Next time we go down to the canal, I'll take some pictures for you. It's lovely down there - yes, very Wind in the Willows. Henley, which was a big part of the inspiration for the book, isn't far away and has a whole museum about the river. It's fascinating stuff!

*grin* I wouldn't mind a holiday on a boat, but I get the feeling living there might get real old, real fast...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:56 pm (UTC)
naye: A cartoon of a woman with red hair and glasses in front of a progressive pride flag. (beyond the blue horizon)
From: [personal profile] naye
It's a boat. *nods wisely*

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
A canal boat.

A "detached" (yup, that's actually used on another website), one storey (and therefore obviously a bungalow) dwelling.

The fact that it happens to float is obviously a minor detail...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:04 pm (UTC)
naye: A cartoon of a woman with red hair and glasses in front of a progressive pride flag. (shanks - hahaha)
From: [personal profile] naye
MINOR DETAIL. YES.

*laughs and laughs*

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-24 08:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ar-gemlad.livejournal.com
Well, obviously you want it to float. Canal side properties in Oxford are prone to flooding, you know!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tiggothy.livejournal.com
Personally I think the owners are to blame - if they don't want to sell privately, there are plenty of brokers & agents out there who specialise in selling boats. The fact it's listed amongst land-based houses would count very much against it if I were looking for a live-aboard boat (which I have looked for in the past).

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
I figure it's just that most property websites don't have a "canal boat" tag for filtering when agents are uploading their property. And to be fair, the agent do seem to handle a few boats and plots of land, unlike most of Oxford agents.

Personally, I think they just did it to make me laugh. But that's just me... ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dune-drd.livejournal.com
OH LOL. BUY THAT ONE. BUY IT NAO!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dune-drd.livejournal.com
IT'S THE PERFECT HOUSE ONCE THE CLIMATE CATASTROPHE HAPPENS!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nightporters.livejournal.com
Um, people would kill to live on a boat. Why not be honest?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
FOR THE LOLs. CLEARLY ;D

I know! There's lots of canal boats in Oxford, and this is one of the prettiest I've seen!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rustydog.livejournal.com
I'm getting curious and a little off the (hilarious) topic, but are all one-story dwellings (on land) considered bungalows?

I've just realized I don't know exactly what a bungalow is. As far as I know we don't use the term in this part of the U.S., and the only other time I ran across it was in the title of a Nancy Drew mystery.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
Yes.

And no.

Um.

Technically yes, everything that is a one storey dwelling (usually on land!) is a bungalow. But over the years, various bungalow owners have converted their attics. So they do have an upstairs bedroom, but it's still a bungalow.

...like the boat, I think they do it on purpose to confuse us!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rustydog.livejournal.com
It's odd, because when I hear "bungalow" the picture in my mind is basically a neat, sturdy little hut, possibly circular and possibly with a thatched roof, and it's almost definitely near a beach. I have no idea why! Wikipedia seems to think it's a common term for all sorts of single-family homes all over the U.S., but I swear I've never heard it used even in a property-selling context. If we go by the definition, my parents live in a bungalow! Crazy. (They have a long, low ranch house, but it is definitely one story.)

The boat is hilarious. I really hope the agent who listed it at least chuckled at him- or herself.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
My impression is that single-story dwellings are more common in the US, especially where there is space. Why go to the trouble of going upwards if you don't have to? In a more crowded country like the UK, bungalows are more unusual, which is probably why people started converting their attics - it makes it feel more like what we would regard as a 'normal' house!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rustydog.livejournal.com
My impression is that single-story dwellings are more common in the US, especially where there is space.

Especially in the South and West, by my observation. (Basements are less common in those places as well. Which is unfortunate since half of the South is in Tornado Alley!) Up north and out east, two-story houses seem more common. Maybe they're easier to heat as well as taking up less land? Whereas down here what we're more concerned about is getting a breeze through those windows. :)

So do you think the commonness of the one-story dwelling is related to the decrease in the use of the term "bungalow"?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
*tilts head* Maybe. I think that 'bungalow' became...not a term of abuse, but not a good thing either. It's not fashionable to live in a bungalow - they're what old people live in because they can't climb the stairs any more. They're just...unsexy, I think.

I hadn't thought of it like that, but yes, a 'two up, two down' (British generic term for a small house - two rooms down stairs, two up and the loo at the end of the garden ;)) would be cheaper to heat, definitely. Which is a good thing over here!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rustydog.livejournal.com
It's not fashionable to live in a bungalow - they're what old people live in because they can't climb the stairs any more. They're just...unsexy, I think.

Hmm, that would explain why people in the UK might not want to use the term (though it seems it's still used there often), but where I live, it's not particularly unfashionable to live in a one-story house. They're just so common. A lot of very nice, decent middle-class houses are one-story, yet we don't use the term "bungalow" at all as far as I've seen. There must be more to this regional language mystery! (We don't have to track down the answer, I just get curious about these things. *g*)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-zedem.livejournal.com
The concept of the one story dwelling is widespread - the US, Canada, Australia, the UK etc etc all have variations on the basic theme, although in the UK we almost exclusively use the term to mean a one story house (whereas elsewhere the house can have rooms built into the attic). From what I can gather, the actual word is Indian in origin, which may explain why it's so widespread in the UK and not so much in the US - our 'proud' *cough* colonial history meant we nicked all sorts of words. It does exist in the US (Google told me, so it must be true), but it seems to be a design term rather than one that the general public would use.

*tilts head* I'm not sure if I helped or hindered there... *butts back out*

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rustydog.livejournal.com
The Wikipedia article did surprise me with all of its examples of US bungalows! I would never have thought of them as that -- they're *houses*. *g* My only thought was that it's a term that used mainly in the East or possibly anywhere outside the "middle," or it has fallen out of use only in the past few decades (which would explain why it was in my mother's childhood copy of Nancy Drew). But actually, if it's a design term, that would make a lot of sense -- I don't read design and architectural literature, and if it's not used in ordinary conversation or in real estate circles, I wouldn't have heard it.

Thank you!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 07:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] travels-in-time.livejournal.com
basically a neat, sturdy little hut, possibly circular and possibly with a thatched roof, and it's almost definitely near a beach.

This.

Also with the connotation of "holiday retreat". Not somewhere you'd actually live.

A one-story house is...a house. :D

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-zedem.livejournal.com
Description fail :)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 07:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
So very much! Not that it's not pretty but NOT A BUNGALOW!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 07:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crystalshard.livejournal.com
*jaw drops*

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 08:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
*grin* I KNOW

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vsee.livejournal.com
Househunting SO sucks, especially for someone like me...a single woman, on a modest income. You would not believe some of the places I've seen, including one house I'd call "zero bedroom" that they were asking over $180,000 for. Horrible. I have seen property with major flood damage being sold for more than $170,000.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 09:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
It is ridiculous at the moment, but believe it or not, I'm looking at those prices and thinking "not too bad". In my part of Oxford, the cheapest 1 bedroom flat is the equivalent of $250,000. Just the cheapest flat in any part of Oxford is almost $200,000 :S

So I'd believe every word you told me! We're incredibly lucky for various reasons (not all of them good), but if you don't have a decent deposit, you just can't get on the market here at all.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 10:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vsee.livejournal.com
Yeah, everything that isn't crap starts at around $250,000. Good luck.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 08:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hab318princess.livejournal.com
ROFL... sorry, that made my day

I know it's no fun for you... but oh wow... sitting here with tears in my eyes from laughing...

I think Estate Agents pronounce it Sploe... comes to mind
Edited Date: 2009-09-23 08:32 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 09:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jadesfire2808.livejournal.com
*giggle* Yes, that's a very good comparative quote!

Ah, we're doing okay - I just have a tendency to swamp myself with information and feel overwhelmed. Once I get some perspective again, I'll be fine :)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 09:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hab318princess.livejournal.com
you'll get there, house buying is after all one of the most stressful things you can do... so take it easy

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 11:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] in-the-bottle.livejournal.com
That's actually a rather pretty boat... I wouldn't mind living there, for a week or two on holiday, but I think the narrowness of it will drive me mad long term. Not to mention not having enough space for all my junk!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-24 05:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] taffimai.livejournal.com
But house boats are AWESOME!